Diesel Locomotive
EMD BL1
EMD
Also known as: BL1, EMD BL1
Technical specifications
History
The EMD BL1 was a single prototype diesel-electric locomotive constructed by General Motors Electro-Motive Division in September 1947, assigned demonstrator number 499 and internally designated as EMD Project 89499. Its development came at a time when EMD's competitors, including Alco, Baldwin, and Fairbanks-Morse, had already introduced road switcher designs that were proving effective at displacing steam power from branch line and secondary service work. EMD's engineers drew heavily on the existing F3 platform when conceiving the BL1, adapting its bridge-truss carbody construction rather than adopting the true load-bearing frame architecture used by competing road switchers. The letters BL stood for Branch Line, reflecting EMD's intent to position the locomotive for light traffic duties and frequent switching operations where the visibility limitations of a conventional full-width carbody unit would be a practical disadvantage. The BL1 differed from the production BL2 units that followed it in several meaningful ways. It was built with a lighter underframe and draft gear than its successors, and it originally lacked multiple-unit capability, having been conceived as a locomotive expected to operate independently as a single unit. An air-actuated throttle was fitted in place of the electro-hydraulic governor and notched throttle arrangement that would later become standard on the BL2. Multiple-unit capability was subsequently added to the BL1 in response to operational feedback, and the lessons drawn from the demonstrator's evaluation informed the specifications of the 58 production BL2 units built between 1947 and 1949. Although the BL series as a whole achieved only modest commercial success due to maintenance difficulties and ergonomic shortcomings, the program proved consequential for EMD's product development. The experience gained from the BL1 and BL2 contributed directly to the conception of the GP7, which addressed the BL's practical failings by employing a straightforward hood unit design with full-length walkways and more accessible mechanical components. In this respect, the solitary BL1 occupies a meaningful place in diesel locomotive history as a transitional machine that helped guide EMD toward one of its most successful and enduring locomotive families.
Technical notes
The BL1 was powered by an EMD 567B prime mover, a two-stroke V-type diesel engine that produced 1,500 horsepower and drove the locomotive through a DC electric transmission system. The locomotive rode on two B-B trucks, meaning each truck carried two axles with individual traction motors, yielding a four-axle configuration overall. This wheel arrangement, expressed in European notation as Bo'Bo', was consistent with the F-unit family from which the BL1 derived its mechanical foundations. The carbody was constructed using the same bridge-truss method employed on the F-units, making it a stressed structural element rather than simply a weather enclosure mounted over a separate load-bearing frame. The rear portion of the body was cut away behind the cab to provide crews with rearward sightlines that a conventional full-width carbody would have obstructed, a practical concession to the switching duties the locomotive was intended to perform. The original configuration of the BL1 reflected its intended role as a single-unit branch line locomotive, with lighter draft gear than would be required for heavy road service and no provision for multiple-unit operation in its as-built form. The air-actuated throttle system fitted to the demonstrator was considered a departure from standard EMD practice and was replaced on production BL2 units by the Woodward electro-hydraulic governor and notched throttle arrangement already in wide use across the F-unit fleet. The engine compartment layout, while innovative in its attempt to reconcile carbody styling with utilitarian accessibility, ultimately proved difficult for shop crews to work with, a shortcoming that contributed to the type's limited appeal among railroad mechanical departments.
Operating railroads
—